Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'news'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • A Test Forum
  • Introduce Yourself
    • Introductions
    • New ArtByte Member Profiles in Beta
  • Getting Started with ArtByte
    • Explore our main website
    • Benefits to artists
    • Beginner
    • Joining the Community & earning free ArtBytes!
    • Creating (Mining) ArtBytes
    • Buying & Selling ArtBytes
    • Discussions about ArtByte communities
  • Announcements
    • ArtByte Artist Festivals
    • ArtByte Artist Showcase
    • ArtByte Announcements
    • Recent Press
    • Behind the scenes
    • ArtByte Roadmap
  • ArtByte Support
    • Wallet Issues
    • Help for Artists
    • Mining
    • Twitter & Reddit tipping events
    • Technical Discussions
  • Artist's Cafe
    • The Artist's Life
    • Inspiration
    • New Projects
    • Let's talk about art
  • ArtByte Foundation Artist Awards
    • ArtByte Artist Awards
    • Nominations for Artists
  • Artist Listing
    • Artist Listing How To
    • Actors
    • Dancers
    • Directors
    • Editors
    • Fashion Designers & Stylists
    • Film Makers
    • Graphic Designers
    • Interdisciplinary Artist
    • Artists working in virtual worlds
    • Models
    • Musicians
    • Painters
    • Photographers
    • Producers
    • Production Team Members
    • Sculptors
    • Writers
  • Artist Resources
    • Resources for Artists
  • Events
    • Services offered for ArtBytes


  • Pappy's Joint
  • Andooga Design
  • satoshisun's Blog
  • KeshKreations' Blog
  • Panzzerirbis' Blog
  • AppleDApps' Blog


  • ArtByte


  • Community Calendar


  • Articles

Found 6 results

  1. Bitcoin ended the first half of 2018 below the $6,000 mark. According to a report, the world’s largest cryptocurrency was priced at $5,862 on Friday. This was Bitcoin lowest price since November 2017. Since the beginning of this year, Bitcoin exchanges in Japan and South Korea have been hacked, which greatly reduced demand for the cryptocurrency. Security and regulatory concerns were raised after subsequent episodes were reported by institutions across the world.
  2. The Philadelphia History Museum Is Closing Its Doors (Maybe for Good) The Philadelphia History Museum can no longer afford to have public viewing hours.CreditLori Waselchuk for The New York Times A museum dedicated to the history of Philadelphia is closing its doors to the public, and it is unclear when — or whether — it will open them again. The Philadelphia History Museum has been struggling to increase revenue for years. City officials were in talks with Temple University to form a partnership that might keep the institution afloat. But this week, they learned that the university had abruptly pulled out of the partnership discussions, leaving the museum’s future uncertain. Michael DiBerardinis, the city’s managing director, said he learned about the university’s decision from news reports. “I’m still wondering what happened,” he said. “I still don’t have clarity.” As of next week, normal public visiting hours will no longer be in effect. That closing is expected to last for at least six months, and it could be indefinite. In the meantime, the museum will hold on to its collection and city officials will try to chart a new way forward, Mr. DiBerardinis said. Though it is not as well known as other tourist attractions like the cracked Liberty Bell, the Valley Forge National Historical Park or the bustling food stands at the Reading Terminal Market, the Philadelphia History Museum on South Seventh Street is home to some of the city’s most valuable artifacts. Housed in its imposing Greek-Revival building are a desk used by President George Washington, the preserved body of a small dog named Philly who once served on the front lines during World War I, and boxing gloves worn by Joe Frazier during a championship match in the 1970s. “There are over 100,000 objects in the museum’s collection that span 334 years of the city’s history, ranging from 1682 to the present day,” said Deana Gamble, the city’s spokeswoman. “The setting is intimate, and people really enjoy the atmosphere of the 1826 historic building, located just steps from the Liberty Bell.” When Philly was alive, she went to the front lines during World War I.CreditLori Waselchuk for The New York Times But for years, that has not been enough. “Revenue generation has been shrinking over time, and then the city subsidized — in a significant way, for years — the operation of the museum,” Mr. DiBerardinis said. He said that Philadelphia had allotted $300,000 to subsidize the museum for the current fiscal year and $250,000 for the next, which begins on Sunday. City officials were hoping that a partnership with Temple would lead to a more sustainable business model. Joe Lucia, the dean of libraries at Temple University, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday. But in an email to The Philadelphia Inquirer, he said that “after careful study, Temple has decided not to pursue an alliance with the Philadelphia History Museum at this time though we will continue to engage in some collaborative activities.” “We wish this important institution all the best as it moves forward with restructuring plans,” Mr. Lucia added. This is not the first time the Philadelphia History Museum has tried to find a partner. In 2015, there were talks about a merger with the Woodmere Art Museum. Those fell through, too. “We’re still committed to trying to figure out the best way to display the major parts of this collection,” Mr. DiBerardinis said on Friday. “How do we continue to interpret the history of this wonderful city? And how do we engage the public in that process and use those artifacts to deepen people’s understanding of our history and our present?”
  3. i think it is the right time to invest some money in bitcoin and altcoins. Because at that time market is down and also it looks like it will not go further down well it is market any thing can happen. so what do you think should we invest at that time or not.
  4. Founder of Museum of Russian Impressionism flees for the UK Boris Mints’s institution says that exhibitions are continuing to run The Museum of Russian Impressionism in Moscow John McAslan + Partners and the Museum of Russian Impressionism A private museum in Moscow set up by a Russian tycoon who has fled the country will continue to run as normal, its director says. The real estate developer Boris Mints opened the Museum of Russian Impressionism in the former Bolshevik confectionery plant in 2016. At the end of May, news emerged that Mints and his family had fled to London, reportedly to avoid possible criminal investigation in Russia over bank dealings. “Nothing has changed” in the running of Mints’s museum in Moscow, its director, Yulia Petrova, said in an email to The Art Newspaper. She noted that the institution has just opened an exhibition, Impressionism in the Avant-Garde (until 19 September), hosted an international conference, and is planning a survey this autumn of the work of the Futurist artist David Burliuk. Whether Mints will continue to fund his museum from the UK is unclear; Petrova declined to discuss the tycoon’s ongoing support of the institution. Queries were referred to his 01 GROUP company which, in turn, referred them back to the museum. Boris Mints Masha Vlasenko Although the Russian government has increasingly encouraged private museums, for example by promoting legislative initiatives to spur their development, it does not provide any funding. A spokesperson for Russia’s Ministry of Culture says that private museums “do not receive any kind of benefits or financing” from the ministry but that “we understand the necessity of building dialogue with [these institutions, which] make an important contribution to promoting a positive image of Russia abroad” and promoting culture to a domestic audience. The risk of an institution being funded primarily by just one or two wealthy individuals underscores the need to create foundations and endowments that can help them weather contingencies, says Anton Belov, the director of the Garage Museum of Contemporary Art in Moscow which was set up by Dasha Zhukova and Roman Abramovich and is now run by a foundation. The billionaire Leonid Mikhelson, who is building a major museum, GES-2, in a former power plant opposite the Kremlin, runs it through the V-A-C Foundation, which he set up to administer his art collection.
  5. 50 years later, St. Louis’ Gateway Arch emerges with a new name and a skeptical view of western expansion The new entrance to the Gateway Arch is connected to Luther Ely Smith Square and includes a cap over I-44. Before the CityArchRiver project, visitors had to cross six lanes of traffic and the sunken interstate highway to reach the Arch from downtown St. Louis. (Gateway Arch Park Foundation) ST. LOUIS — On July 3, one of this country’s most recognizable landmarks will be reintroduced to the world with a new name, a new museum and a substantial redesign of its urban landscape. A half-century after Eero Saarinen’s Gateway Arch was inaugurated in 1968, it has been reconnected to the city of St. Louis, with a sleek underground entrance facing the city, an expanded and redesigned visitor center and museum, a cleaner landscape and an elevated and more elegant waterfront along the Mississippi River. An old parking garage has been removed and a parklike pedestrian platform over Interstate 44 allows visitors from downtown St. Louis to visit the city’s most popular attraction without having to brave traffic lanes. But it is the new name that encapsulates the larger cultural changes to the National Park Service site, which has been give a $380 million renovation and redesign. What was once known as the Jefferson National Expansion Park has been recast as the Gateway Arch National Park. That change simply reflects how people think about the park, says Eric Moraczewski, executive director of Gateway Arch Park Foundation, a nonprofit group that partnered with the National Park Service to raise funds and oversee the renovation. There is no intention to downgrade Jefferson’s importance or the park’s original purpose, which was to memorialize “the men who made possible the western territorial expansion of the United States,” including “the great explorers, Lewis and Clark, and the hardy hunters, trappers, frontiersmen and pioneers,” according to a 1933 statement by a local civic group that championed the idea of building something monumental on the Mississippi waterfront. The name change, however, also reflects two facts that have long bedeviled the arch and its role within the National Park Service. Saarinen’s soaring arc of steel is an icon of the automobile age, an attraction that has always been more about playing to the passing audience of the interstates than any particular relevance to the idea of national expansion. It also honors historical events that are now understood as deeply problematic within the larger trajectory of American history, including the dispossession of Native American land, cultural genocide, the extension of slavery, centuries of conflict and ill will with Mexico, environmental degradation and the emergence of a myth of American exceptionalism. [A national memorial to the victims of lynching opens in Montgomery] The arch, in short, has always been beloved because it binds together two feel-good ideas that are essential to American identity: a heroic past of grit and conquest, and a triumphant future of innovation. Now, well into the 21st century, the challenge is how to disentangle and even dismantle those ideas while salvaging the arch as a cultural object. The solution, mostly effective, has been to think in terms of connection, both to the city which hosts it, and to the deeper currents of history that led to its creation. Standing on the grassy deck which crosses Interstate 44, Moraczewski points to the nearby Hyatt Hotel, where the concierge used to call taxis to ferry people a few hundred feet to the arch grounds before the renovation. “The arch operated as an island,” he says. “Our island was about roads, not water, but people came to the arch and never went into the city.” A view looking west of the new entrance of the Gateway Arch National Park. Before the CityArchRiver project, visitors had to cross six lanes of traffic and the sunken interstate highway to reach the Arch from downtown St. Louis. (Sam Fentress) The connecting park isn’t terribly wide — just shy of the 300-foot width which would have defined the structure as a tunnel, rather than a bridge, requiring costly ventilation and other mandated changes. But it is wide enough to include trees and benches and arcing paths that attract a lunchtime crowd, dog walkers, joggers and tourists from the nearby hotels. It also emphasizes a connection between the arch and the historic courthouse which faces it, the courthouse where Dred Scott pursued his freedom from slavery, and where a Missouri judge decided that allowing an enslaved person to claim freedom because they resided in a free state would lead to the inevitable “overthrow and destruction of our government.” The arch grounds now flow seamlessly into the plaza that fronts the courthouse and lead visitors to the sunken, glass-walled entrance to the museum. Before the design changes, there was nothing to indicate that the arch park had anything in it other than an arch, and visitors encountered the underground museum as a sideshow to the main attraction, which was a ride in the cramped and clanking elevator cars that deliver people to the observation room atop the 630-foot tall structure. Now, visitors are greeted by a semicircular and embracing entrance, from which they descend into the museum via a large, open atrium with a terrazzo map of North America on the mezzanine floor, showing the main migration routes during the era of westward expansion. Giant video screens project images of buffalo running, and wagon trains moving through a backdrop of mountains and open range. These videos set a slightly odd tone — grand and nostalgic — which isn’t sustained in the rest of the museum. The new exhibitions, created by Haley Sharpe Design, are more substantial, extending the story of westward migration back to the colonial days of St. Louis, and grappling with the fundamental questions posed by the historical narrative. In a gallery devoted to Manifest Destiny, wall panels ask not only “How the West Was Won,” but was the west “stolen,” and what of the North — as Mexico understood the same land — and was it “stolen” too? “After the Louisiana Purchase, women lost many rights . . .” reads another wall panel, noting some of the cultural impacts of the purchase of territory inhabited by Native Americans, then claimed by the French, ceded to the Spanish, reclaimed by Napoleon and ultimately transferred to the United States in 1803. “Does staking claim to land justify national ownership?” asks another exhibit, devoted to the exploration of Lewis and Clark. [A museum to the bible is better than skeptics anticipated] Videos allow Native Americans to address these questions in personal ways, and take stock of the dreadful loss of life, land and culture that came with European incursion into the continent. But these voices are compartmentalized in the usual fashion of contemporary museum design, which tends to an a la carte approach to history. If your understanding of the age of westward expansion is all about free-roaming buffalo, covered wagons, steamboats plying the Mississippi and frontier women baking hearty meals, you can find that too. Haley Sharpe Design, which also created the Democracy galleries for the Smithsonian National Museum of American History, adds texture to the story, makes connections (to trade, and the larger economic and cultural context) and avoids conclusions, even when dark conclusions are ineluctable. Wall panels in the museum ask not only “How the West Was Won,” but was the west “stolen?” (Gateway Arch Park Foundation) The museum concludes with the design and construction of the arch itself, which was an urban renewal project that led to the loss of the colonial-era street grid, and hundreds of buildings, many erected in the 19th century. It was an exercise in branding, a scheme cooked during the Depression and sold on a national scale. It took more than 30 years between the inception and the opening of the arch. Saarinen died in 1961, long after he won the 1947 design competition, and well before construction was completed in 1965. The museum notes that the realization of Saarinen’s futuristic vision happened during the tumultuous years of the civil rights movement and that African Americans protested at the arch site for not having equal access to construction jobs on the project. In the intervening years, Jefferson’s stock has fallen, and Saarinen’s has soared. He is a revered figure of modernism, and the arch is probably his best-known and most-loved project. With the Gateway Arch, he not only created an architectural spectacle grand enough to fill the site, but he helped define one of the essential trends of architecture for the past half-century, the dominance of iconic power over function. The whole idea for a park and a monument to westward expansion was bizarre: Why in St. Louis, when other cities could also claim to be the Western gateway? And why an arch, which suggests the pioneers somehow passed through a giant croquet wicket? But Saarinen finessed the problem rather like corporate architects today finesse the problem of housing large, impersonal, often rapacious organizations in buildings that suggests transparency, openness and idealism. He found a gesture that overwhelmed skepticism, both skepticism about the viability of the project, but also the larger historical skepticism that Americans have traditionally found inconvenient and dispiriting. His arch stole the show, which made it possible to avoid the history, except as a passing entertainment. Saarinen understood how essentially American the arch form was, a symbol of triumph and conquest that is hollow at its core.
  6. buying artbyte

    i am just buying some more Artbyte. Because i belive it will gilve me very good profit. what do you think i am right or wrong.